Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. POS structure manufacturing - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ok, i really hope these are just placeholder stats and will be adjusted. I just compared a Large Amarr control tower BPO (current NPC price 360m) with a large pulse laser BPO (current NPC price 9m) the Large (!) tower takes 15 units each of 8 di...
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.05.03 10:59:00
|
2. CCP if want tyrannis and dust514 to succeed read this. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
"good" highsec deposits can be balanced out somewhat by 1. competition, this will happen automatically and produce diminhishing returns 2. taxes, the npc empire should just take a sizable chunk of the production (more in high then in low sec) ma...
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.03.11 12:36:00
|
3. GM Incognito - What is your stance on the Z-R Sov Bug - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: KaiserSoze434 1. CVA and friends are repeatedly stating that this system is hideously broken and favors the attacker to such a huge degree that defense is impossible. By "hideously broken" they probably mean they cant s...
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.02.20 15:06:00
|
4. Pathetic customer service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lady Karma I will reply in the helpful and constructive manner of UK when posting in CAOD about game breaking bugs that don't effect them. Cry moar noobs I dont care much if some random provipets get to keep sov in th...
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.02.18 17:47:00
|
5. CVA Surrender! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Meja can i have your amarr stuff? dibs on the Templars (an Amarr fighter commonly used by Amarr carriers)
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.02.13 17:43:00
|
6. Carebear Beware (Provi will burn!) - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Gixxer 1000 Edited by: Gixxer 1000 on 24/01/2010 07:11:22 It was mentioned many times in fleet chat and comms, that CVA and company is now considered to be sided with Goon's, a label that hasn't done well for peeps in th...
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.01.25 13:03:00
|
7. CCP is preemptively banning accounts based on IP addresses - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rashmika Clavain **** me, if my account was being accessed by an IP associated with known hacking attempts I would be happy for my account to be blocked in order to protect it. ^^ this Buddy of mine got his account pro...
- by Amy Wang - at 2010.01.19 11:11:00
|
8. Technetium - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Indeed it makes no sense. Indeed there has been ample warning this would happen thanks to Akita and some other number crunshers. CCP did not listen or did not care. It is almost as if they wanted to deliberately strenghten the inhabitans of th...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.12.18 12:47:00
|
9. increased R.A.M. demand to start a job? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
oh, I see, thanks for that info
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.12.18 10:42:00
|
10. increased R.A.M. demand to start a job? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
So, I'm building 1500 instances of an item in a rapid assembly array at a pos. Once run does 15% damage to a R.A.M.. In the past that meant I need one R.A.M. per six runs present to start the job but since Dominion I need 1500 units of R.A.M. (in...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.12.18 10:00:00
|
11. Welcome to dominion, not even super caps are safe from titans - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Amy Wang on 07/12/2009 12:33:00 his fault really for 1. logging the thing on in the first place before the ship class got their overdue boost 2. using a silly fitting, even nowadays a mom can be fit to withstand 2 doomsdays
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.12.07 12:33:00
|
12. Dominion: The ISK faucet - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
funny 1. most 0.0 alliance with 120 active and organized people have better and more fun things to do then farm anomalies, like whack their neighbors over the head 2. the same 120 people running high sec lvl 4 missions would prolly make the same...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.12.03 11:27:00
|
13. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
from patch notes: Quote: # Titans will receive a boost to all primary hit point buffers by 300%, all secondary buffers by 150%, and all structure by 100%. It should be noted that Titan pilots logging into Tranquility post Dominion deploymen...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.12.01 18:32:00
|
14. Another skill nerf - Black ops - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Amy Wang on 29/11/2009 17:34:26 I found it too easy when they reduced cloaking 5 to cloaking 4 back then before the release electronics 4 or 5 is pretty irrelevant as that is a must-have-to-5-skill anyway pretty much but you are c...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.29 17:31:00
|
15. Supercarriers what wil happend to them after the nerf? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Murixo CCP = Useless. My Wyvern will now be alpha'd by a couple of Titans, woop! If that happens you made a mistake. Like...logging the mothership on :P Hope they get around buffing them properly soon (tm) but still b...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.22 10:40:00
|
16. CCP it is OK if you Delay Dominion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Agreed, the aims to change so many things were too ambitious or so it appears. Take another month or two and work it over, better then releasing something that isnt finished. Paddling back on the mom/sc changes (the silly ones not the originial ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.20 12:09:00
|
17. Come n get dem Super Dreadnoughts. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Amy Wang on 19/11/2009 13:43:07 Amazed they didnt think of that already, dont give them ideas man. Would have to remove the Jump portal and gang bonus from titan then ofc as a) it is too cheap to have them and b) it does not fit wi...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.19 13:43:00
|
18. Supercarriers - just because? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Chribba Think of all the poor SC-alts that no longer has to be active in order to sit in the ship when they dock... they will be quite bored... possibly even cancelled!! THINK OF THE ALTS!! Or sold for a lot less th...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.16 11:46:00
|
19. Fix the Technetium bottleneck - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Roemy Schneider Edited by: Roemy Schneider on 15/11/2009 12:04:59 /me climbs up amy's shoulder and whispers something into her ear about armor plates not having anything to do with technetium Thanks for the pointer,...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.15 15:01:00
|
20. Fix the Technetium bottleneck - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The changes to t2 material requirements have devalued the Dysprosium and Promethium high end moons by a good margin, just as intended. But by massively increasing the need for armor plates another even worse bottleneck occurs: Technetium What ma...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.15 11:23:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |